Every judgment takes the same 22-field LinkedIn row as input and returns the same shape out: score, signals, tags, rationale. Run one or compose all five.
Who to talk to first.
Rank a list by reachability + relevance — verified contact, current company quality, role-fit on your spec, recent activity.
triageHighest reachability + strongest current-company signal in your set.
Who's about to leave.
Tenure shape, hiring-spree at competitors, title decay, public signals (recommendations, certifications, side projects). Built for talent retention and outbound recruiting.
flight-riskThree stacked signals point to an open-to-listen window this quarter.
Who's worth interviewing.
Surface candidates whose actual career tells a coherent story for the role — not whose résumé pattern-matches the job description.
hire-signalCoherent arc — interview on what she actually did, not the titles.
Who can introduce you.
Given a target person, find the shortest credibly-warm path in your team's network. Considers shared companies, schools, and dated overlap.
warm-introShortest path: Sara Chen → Beta → Sam. One hop credible.
What their career is actually doing.
A narrative summary of someone's career — the inflections, the bets, the unsaid stuff. For board prep, key-hire diligence, executive coaching.
career-arcStarted as IC at Beta, sustained climb, now founding. Coherent thesis.
Your own scoring rubric.
Bring a prompt and a rubric; we run it against every profile in the list and return the structured score + rationale. Scale tier only.
customBest for talent-intel teams with proprietary scoring criteria.
One job can run multiple judgment kinds against the same list. The dossier returns all of them per profile — and you only pay for the reads + the per-judgment add-on.